STATEMENT OF
Mr. VIRENDRA DAYAL
MEMBER
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF INDIA
AND
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
ASIA PACIFIC FORUM OF NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS
TO THE 2nd SESSION OF THE
AD HOC COMMITTEE ON A COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRAL INTERNATIONAL
CONVENTION ON PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE RIGHTS AND DIGNITY OF PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES
NEW YORK, 18 JUNE 2003
Mr Chairman
Thank you for giving me the
floor.
I speak to you today on
behalf of the National Human Rights Commission of India and the Asia Pacific
Forum of National Human Rights Institutions.
In April 2002 the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights stated that “it will be of utmost
importance that not only States but also National Human Rights Institutions …
are able to contribute their experience to the elaboration of the new
Convention” on the rights of persons with disabilities.
Mr Chairman, national human
rights institutions were therefore very pleased that this Ad Hoc Committee
decided to specifically extend an invitation to us to participate in your
work.
National human rights
institutions play a crucial role in translating international human rights
norms and standards into practical action at the ground level, where of course
it matters most. National human rights
institutions believe, therefore, that they have much to contribute to this
process of developing a new Convention.
For example, the National
Human Rights Commission of India has undertaken a number of significant
investigations into violations against the rights of people with disabilities –
particularly with regard to the treatment of people with intellectual and
psychiatric disabilities – in India. Ms
Anuradha Mohit, our Commission’s Special Rapporteur on the rights of people with
disabilities, will be able to provide you with much more detailed information
on our activities during the course of this session. But the experience of the Indian Commission working in this field
strongly demonstrates the need for the development of a Comprehensive and
Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights
of Persons with Disabilities. While
existing international human rights standards require that persons with disabilities
should enjoy the same basic human rights as all other human beings, in many
respects, this is not the case and they are subjected to widespread violations
of their human rights. It is the view
of National Human Rights Commission of India that the development of a specific
Convention on the rights of peoples with disabilities is, therefore, long
overdue.
Mr Chairman
I am pleased to state that
this view of the Indian Commission is also strongly held by the 12 national
human rights institutions from Australia, Fiji, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia,
Nepal, New Zealand, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka and Thailand that
make up the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions. At the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Forum,
which was held in New Delhi, India, in November 2002, Forum members stated that
a comprehensive and integral convention was necessary to give “status,
authority and visibility” to disability issues and that this could not be
achieved through the process of reform of existing international instruments and
monitoring mechanisms. Moreover, Forum
member institutions believed that a single comprehensive treaty would better
enable the State Parties to understand their obligations in clear terms. The elaboration of a new treaty would thus
complement existing international standards for the rights of people with
disabilities. Finally Forum member
institutions “agreed to respond
positively to the invitation of the United Nations Ad Hoc Committee to
participate independently in the development of the possible new convention” [1]
and, following a process of consultation with people with disabilities
themselves, to make available to this Ad Hoc Committee suggestions about
elements that should be included in the new Convention. Forum members therefore requested that the Forum secretariat, in cooperation with
its member institutions, develop and advocate proposals for a possible new
convention for the consideration of the Ad Hoc Committee.[2]
Mr Chairman
In following up the
decisions of Forum’s seventh annual meeting, the National Human Rights
Commission of India agreed to host an International Workshop on the Development
of the Proposed New International Convention from the 26th to 29th May 2003 in New Delhi, India. This international workshop was organised in
cooperation with the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions,
the British Council and the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights. 21 national human rights
institutions from both the Commonwealth and the Asia Pacific region, consisting
of the institutions from Afghanistan, Australia, Fiji, Ghana, India, Iran,
Republic of Korea, Malawi, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand,
Nigeria, Northern Ireland, Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Thailand and
Uganda attended along with representatives from governments, non-governmental
organisations, international agencies and experts working in the field of human
rights and disability.
The workshop held nine
working sessions on issues such as the impact of national legislation and
administrative practice; the role of national human rights institutions in
promoting the rights of persons with disabilities; mainstreaming disability –
the experiences of United Nations Conventions (hard instruments) and existing
(soft) instruments; international monitoring mechanisms and complaints
procedures; the nature and key elements of the proposed new Convention and
perceptions of national human rights institutions and non-governmental
organisations; and partnership strategies for action for the development of the
new Convention. Following detailed
discussions on each of these matters, the workshop adopted a set of preliminary
conclusions and recommendations for consideration of this Ad Hoc Committee.
I understand that a copy of
a comprehensive background paper and the concluding statement of the workshop
have been submitted to the Ad Hoc Committee.
I will, therefore, simply highlight the key conclusions. The participants:
·
Strongly
affirmed the need for the development of a comprehensive and integral
Convention;
·
Stressed
that the Convention should be a ‘rights based’ instrument built on
international human rights norms and standards and social justice. It should be informed by
the overarching principle that all persons with disabilities, without
exception, are entitled to the full benefit and enjoyment of all fundamental
human rights and freedoms on the basis of equality, dignity and without
discrimination.
·
Stressed
that the situation of all disability groups and the diverse conditions related
to gender, race, colour, age, ethnicity and other considerations must be taken
into account when elaborating the Convention.
I would draw the attention
of members of the Ad Hoc Committee to the full concluding statement and, in
particular, the series of specific recommendations it makes relating to
elements that should be included in the provisions of the proposed Convention
Mr Chairman
One of the primary
objectives of a disability convention should be to transact a shift from an
approach based on welfare to one firmly grounded on human rights. The development of a comprehensive and
integral international convention provides an opportunity to demonstrate the
indivisibility and interdependence of rights on one hand, and on the other, the
symbiotic interplay between development and human rights. The development of such a Convention would
be a signal achievement of the early years of the 21st Century – and
it is an objective that all national human rights institutions look forward to
realising.
Thank you.
[1] Paragraph 13, Concluding Statement of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the APF, http://www.asiapacificforum.net/activities/annual_meetings/seventh/concluding.htm
[2] Discussion paper, Seventh Annual Meeting of the APF, http://www.asiapacificforum.net/activities/annual_meetings/seventh/meeting_papers.htm